Comments on: Berners Pool – Hodders Associates, Cumbria

By: cumbria kitchens

cumbria kitchens — Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:21:29 +0000

Wonderful web site. Plenty of useful information here. I am sending it to a few friends ans additionally sharing in delicious. And of course, thank you to your sweat!

By: Alison Binks

Alison Binks — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 09:18:47 +0000

I agree with the case berners should not have been built because I worked there and lost my job. It is a wreck. People liked it while it lasted but not for long. What a waste of money. Is it going to be knocked down or what is happening with it? Alison and Tom Binks

By: Matt D

Matt D — Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:30:53 +0000

Berners Pool should never have been built in the first place. There were never going to be enough people through he doors to fund it. Once again a case of local egos being bigger than the local community.

By: Alison and Tom Binks

Alison and Tom Binks — Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:14:34 +0000

We are totally disgraced with the site of Berners now, it should be knocked down with a JCB digger! It will never be the same again.

By: jim

jim — Sat, 29 May 2010 15:55:23 +0000

puzzled, If all building regs were complied with,and I presume local council inspectors, were involved at each stage of build, why did builders / architect get paid if the final job was not signed off, and why cant legel action be taken against both builder /architect?. after so few years, to become unusable something was not done correctly

By: David

David — Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:39:28 +0000

“same architect………..” hmmmmm
Many things are the culprit in this demise, but the construction details published in the Architects Journal building study showed fundamentaly flawed detailing born of an architectural intent that appears more about graphic design on a piece of paper than something that can be practically built and endure without excessive defects and maintenance. Much of this inadequacy cannot be blamed on budget cutting and cost cutting. The architecture is suspect. It does all practical and competent modernists a diservice.
Its a cruel twist of fate that because of the procurement process the builder and architect could not be sued to get both recompence for the community and an inquiry into the architects competence.

By: Peter

Peter — Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:44:54 +0000

Interesting question from Alex, but in fact it was the same architect!

By: alex splode

alex splode — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:24:11 +0000

Clissold and Berners seem to display worrying similarities.
Did the same builder build them both ?

By: Lionel Prodgers

Lionel Prodgers — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:39:47 +0000

I know nothing of the local circumstances, but the story unfolding here is a common one. When new schemes are commissioned very few organisations (public and private sector) consider the full extent of the commitment needed. The whole life cycle ‘cost in use’ is several times the cost of the building. When maintenance budgets are cut and/or faults obverlooked, you can be sure that it is the beginning of the demise of the facility.

By: David Huggett

David Huggett — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:41:37 +0000

This is one of the big tragedies of Grange. So much effort was put into getting the pool on the local agenda and actually built, a magnificent achievement by the local people. Unfortunately the cost cutting that went on at design stage downgraded the facility so it was unmanageable and uneconomic to run. Whilst the design concept worked well and it was an excellent pool to swim in with its unique swimming view. The over expensive and unnecessary design detail made it a nightmare to manage on a day to day basis. The fact that 2 years after the pool was opened the building and M & E had still not been signed off, as there were many unresolved serious ventilation and structural problems for which there was no money to rectify speaks for itself. The opening was delayed because the pool was not ready to programme and this seriously eroded the little extra finance the trustees has available to run the pool before it opened. Lack of cash flow and pending large plant expentiture was the final straw. Only £300,000 to £500,000 would have secured the pool at that time. Now it is a total wreck and unfortunatly has to go. Many tried so hard. Berners RIP